Kiplinger.com Multimedia
Subscribe
Starting Out Investing Your Money Spending Wisley Your Retirement
Kiplinger.com Channels
Tools
Columns
E-mail Alerts
The Kiplinger Letter
Online Forum
Basics
Site Map
Kiplinger Store
Customer Service
Corporate Sales
About Kiplinger
Give A Gift

ABOUT THIS ENTRY
This page contains a single entry by Jon Frandsen published on June 14, 2008 2:30 PM.

Corporate Taxes: Change in the Making was the previous entry.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About this blog

Subscribe to this blog's feed

EMAIL
DIGG
DEL.ICIO.US

FALL ELECTION
Did Not, Did Too, Did Not ...

Comments (1) |

With John McCain and Barack Obama both promising to run their campaigns on the high road, expect both of them to accuse the other of taking the low road. And when either of the candidates or their campaigns do, skip over the charge of going negative and look carefully at what caused them to complain in the first place. Sometimes the accusation might be fair...but often it will be a way of trying to duck a legitimate jab.

For two candidates running as reformers promising to change the warring atmosphere of the capital, it's only natural and even fair that the way a campaign is conducted will become an important part of the back and forth between now and November. But if Obama and McCain are going to really change the tone in Washington, they need to learn to own up to inconsistencies, gaffes and errors in judgment, not try to hide them or change the conversation by complaining about negative campaigning.

Earlier this month, McCain was asked by a reporter in New Orleans why he twice voted against creating an independent commission to investigate the government's bungling response to Hurricane Katrina. He responded by saying he had "supported every investigation." The Obama campaign and Democrats quickly pointed to two votes where McCain actually had opposed creation of such commissions. The next response from McCain? His campaign issued a statement accusing Obama of "launching the same tired negative attacks that the American people are so sick and tired of."

So what, exactly, is "negative" about challenging an opponent on facts? If they are flat wrong, say so and document it. The problem for McCain is that Obama was right, as documented by the web site FactCheck.org. Is there anything more tired than the same old Washington tactic of blowing smoke to try to hide that you blew it?

Obama reacted in a similar way a few days ago when confronted with a Wall Street Journal story saying Jim Johnson, in charge of vetting potential running mates, had received preferential treatment from a mortgage company. Such questions were "a game that can be played" in campaigns. Well, perhaps. But if you are going to let the guy in question go a day later, as Obama did, perhaps you ought not to start dealing with the matter by questioning the motives of critics.

For candidates promising straight talk, it seems really have been so hard to say things like, "I forgot about those votes" or "I have to know more about the accusations before I say anything." If Obama and McCain keep it up they'll have a pretty difficult time convincing voters that they'll change much of anything. Nothing is more politics than usual than laying blame everywhere but on your own shoulders.
 

0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Did Not, Did Too, Did Not ....

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.kiplinger.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/178

1 Comments

GregK said:

Does voting against a particular bill to establish a commission necessarily mean that you oppose the creation of a commission?

No. The bill might have other nonsense attached to it.

Politics is messy, and trying to reduce it to sound bites almost always results in a misrepresentation.

It's entirely possible that McCain "supported every investigation" but opposed specific bills. The question is how you report on such nuance when campaign coverage rarely goes beyond what can be printed on a bumper sticker.

Leave a comment


RECENT BLOG ENTRIES

MORE POLITICAL COVERAGE FROM KIPLINGER