ABOUT THIS ENTRY
This page contains a single entry by Jon Frandsen
published on
March 11, 2008 11:45 AM.
What If Clinton Were the One Leading? was the previous entry.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
CONGRESS
Conservatives on the Edge
That remains to be seen. The Republican Party as a whole did move to the middle in selecting John McCain over more conservative presidential candidates, but many on the right remain reluctant to support McCain. Longtime conservative activist Brent Bozell wrote a piece in The Washignton Post Sunday arguing that McCain must move dramatically to the right and promise to confront Democrats if he has any hope of having the conservative base turnout in November.
Bozell acknowledges that such a move could hurt the GOP in the presidential and congressional elections but says allowing the party to move further away from conservative ideals would be more damaging to the movement in the long run. But Bozell's strategy also could have the opposite effect, marginalizing the right -- and the Republican Party along with it -- for years to come.
Confrontational politics and zealous pursuit of ideological goals are the paths that got the party where it is today -- in the minority in the House and Senate and in serious danger of losing the White House. And it was Hastert and former Majority Leader Tom DeLay who helped chart that path.
While Hastert did manage to work fairly well with Democratic President Bill Clinton in his last two years of office, under President Bush he became far more partisan and far less compromising. He developed a philosophy of refusing to bring up legislation unless it was backed by a majority of Republicans. That meant some centrist legislation supported by a majority of the entire House would be ignored -- and that was true even of bills passed by the GOP-led Senate. Parliamentary rules were stretched beyond recognition. A particularly favored tactic was to hold votes open, sometimes for hours, while leaders tried to bully or cut deals with recalcitrant members. Anyone who was not with them on key issues was regarded as a near enemy. Republicans who crossed the leadership too often or on key issues were stripped of committee chairmanships and plum assignments. When McCain once opposed a tax bill Hastert supported, Hastert questioned McCain's patriotism and loyalty.
While many issues Americans cared about remained trapped in congressional disputes, Hastert and DeLay made a point of pursuing legislation that was of great concern to the conservative base but either could not pass the Senate or was of little interest to the broader electorate. How out of step they could sometimes be was illustrated by efforts to intervene in the case of Terry Schiavo, who was determined by multiple doctors and courts to be in a persistent vegetative state, although her family disagreed with the diagnosis. State courts sided with her husband and his desire to allow her to die. Congress tried to reverse the ruling by forcing the issue into federal courts. The federal courts wouldn't play along, however, and embarrassed Congress by chiding it for overstepping its bounds.
As the disconnect between GOP leadership and public priorities grew, so did voter anger and mistrust. Hastert quit the leadership after the party's loss a year and half ago and resigned in mid-term. But it seems apparent with the demoralizing loss of Hastert's seat, Denny's seat, that the woes he helped heap on his party may go on a lot longer. Especially if conservatives and GOP leaders display no understanding of how they got in this fix in the first place.
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Conservatives on the Edge.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.kiplinger.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/67
1 Comments
Leave a comment
RECENT BLOG ENTRIES
MORE POLITICAL COVERAGE FROM KIPLINGER
OUR FAVORITE SITES
- The Hotline Blog
- Political Wire
- PollingReport.com
- New York Times Election Guide 2008
- P2008 (George Washington University)
- Pollster.Com
- The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press
- FactCheck.Org
- US Politics Guide.com
- First Read (MSNBC)
- The Note (ABC News)
- Politico.com
- National Review: The Corner
- The Huffington Post
- Peggy Noonan (Wall Street Journal)
- Mark Shields
- David Brooks (New York Times)



What could possibly be sad about these backwards-looking dinosaurs losing their power? Conservatives are responsible for some good things, as are all elements of the political spectrum, but mostly they have been a bunch of power hungry chicken-hawks feeding at the public trough. It's time for the Republican Party to throw off the influence of the half-wits and bigots and build a new coalition. Good lord, I can't believe the mental midgets spouting idiocies we've had to put up with. McCain could do it, but I say he's drifted too far right. It's his pragmatic independence that is so valuable - he generally tries to do the right thing regardless of the results. It's that pragmatism that has defined the success of the American system for over 200 years.