Kiplinger.com Multimedia
Subscribe
Starting Out Investing Your Money Spending Wisley Your Retirement
Kiplinger.com Channels
Tools
Columns
E-mail Alerts
The Kiplinger Letter
Online Forum
Basics
Site Map
Kiplinger Store
Customer Service
Corporate Sales
About Kiplinger
Give A Gift

ABOUT THIS ENTRY
This page contains a single entry by Mark Willen published on March 25, 2008 8:27 AM.

Here's an Inside Look at McCain's Economic Advisers was the previous entry.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About this blog

Subscribe to this blog's feed

EMAIL
DIGG
DEL.ICIO.US

DEMOCRATIC CAMPAIGN
A Week Later: Obama's Speech Revisited

Comments (2) |

In the week since Barack Obama delivered his groundbreaking speech on race in America, his words -- and the controversial words of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright that prompted the speech -- have dominated the news. So what do we know now that we didn't know a week ago?

 

The Wright controversy hasn't derailed his run for the nomination. After suffering a hit in the polls, he's recovered somewhat and he's still the favorite to win the nomination. He benefited from the collapse of do-over voting plans in Florida and Michigan and the high-profile backing of superdelegate, former candidate and former Clinton ally Bill Richardson. His lead in pledged delegates seems insurmountable. Clinton needs a major event to change the dynamics. 

But the controversy is not going away. There is still plenty of criticism floating around the web and op-ed pages. That's why he took time out from his vacation in the Virgin Islands to comment about it in a radio interview. Voters in Pennsylvania will give it a thorough going over -- and that's good for Obama. The more it's discussed and debated now, the better. But it will still come back to dog him in a big way in the fall if he is the Democratic nominee.

So far, the speech has shored up support among those already backing him, while impressing a lot of pundits and historians. Many praised his candid and nuanced approach, his ability and willingness to tackle complex and controversial subjects and his courage for not taking the easy way out. Washington Post columnist David Broder said the speech showed that if elected president, he would use the bully pulpit of the presidency "to inform, educate and inspire people."

But Obama's opponents weren't swayed and insisted the speech was too clever by half for avoiding the key questions. Typical were columns by the Washington Post's Charles Krauthammer who argued that Obama can't dodge responsibility for not parting ways with Wright a long time ago. 

 

The big unknown is how those in the middle will react. For the moment, that means blue collar whites in Pennsylvania, who will vote in the Democratic primary on April 22. Clinton still holds a double-digit lead in state polls. Obama is trying to cut it down, while already working to lower expectations by saying he just wants to get close. That's all he needs to do to maintain his delegate lead, assuming he does as well as expected in the other nine states voting between now and the end of mid June.

 

0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: A Week Later: Obama's Speech Revisited.

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.kiplinger.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/86

2 Comments

OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE said:

OBAMA IS UNELECTABLE IN GENERAL ELECTION
Easy to already see Republican attack ads against Obama. First open with videos of wife, Michelle, saying she was proud of America "for the first time" because of her husband's presidential candidacy, next Obama explaining that he doesn't wear an American flag lapel pin or hold his hands to his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance because it is a "substitute for true patriotism." Then flash a clip of Obama explaining that his Caucasian grandmother was a "typical white person" because she uttered racial epithets and was afraid of black people. Finally, the coup de grace, pictures of Obama's angry, arm-waving preacher blaming the United States for 9/11 and shouting "God Damn America" to the rafters of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ and preaching the U.S. government formulated the HIV AIDS virus to commit genocide against blacks. Even though Obama supposedly condemning Wright's shocking verbal assaults against the U.S and White Americans, even last year; Obama was the first to publically demand Don Imus ouster for making a racially insensitive remark, and Obama continues to support Wright's racism and remains at the church for more than 20 years. it's a good environment to expose his young daughters to. His opinions and issues change with the weather, he is too UNSTABLE and proven he cannot make a decision or stay with one. If that's not enough, then you start showing his terrible senate voting record, Obama when faced with tough choices always gave in to pressure from the Bush administration or corporate lobbyists, Obama dealings with one of his largest contributors, Exelon, a big nuclear power company and the deals he cut behind closed doors to protect them from full disclosure in the nuclear industry. Obamas record shows he, in fact, did support the war when he got to the Senate, voted twice against bringing America's troops back home. And lastly ALL the corrupt indicted financial backers, like Rezko?Get out of the race Obama you are destroying the democratic party!

MYTH: Barack Obama is running a positive campaign that will unite Americans.
FACT: Barack Obama and his advisers have conducted a divisive "full assault" on Hillary's character. While talking a lot about the politics of hope, change and unity, Sen. Obama and his campaign have been conducting a relentless and singularly personal assault on Hillary's character. They have blanketed big states with false negative mailers and radio ads and have described Hillary and her campaign as "disingenuous," "divisive," "untruthful," "dishonest," "polarizing," "calculating," "saying whatever it takes to win," "attempting to deceive the American people," "one of the most secretive in America." That's neither unifying nor hopeful. If Sen. Obama really is the prohibitive favorite some say he is, these negative attacks make absolutely no sense. Why would a frontrunner seek to attack and divide? If Sen. Obama can't unify Democrats in a primary, how can he unify Americans in a general election?

axt113 said:

Her campaign is divisive, she's been trying to tear him down while building up McCain, she's staying in the race even though there is no way for her to win legitimately and she is being dishonest as her Bosnia lies proved.

Obama has by comparison run a very open and honest campaign, as his releasing of all of his tax returns and earmark data has shown.

Even being the victim of an MSM swiftboat attack with Wright, the full sermons on Youtube show that fox has lied about his pastor being a racist, have failed to stop him.

Obama is the best cantidate the country has had in decades, and I trust that true americans will realize that.

Leave a comment


RECENT BLOG ENTRIES

MORE POLITICAL COVERAGE FROM KIPLINGER